Skip to main content

Migrating from xUnit.net

Performance Boost

Migrating from xUnit to TUnit can significantly improve test execution speed. Benchmarks show TUnit is 1.3x faster than xUnit v3 on average. Check the detailed benchmarks to see performance comparisons.

Quick Reference​

xUnitTUnit
[Fact][Test]
[Theory][Test]
[InlineData(...)][Arguments(...)]
[MemberData(nameof(...))][MethodDataSource(nameof(...))]
[ClassData(typeof(...))][MethodDataSource(nameof(ClassName.Method))]
[Trait("key", "value")][Property("key", "value")]
IClassFixture<T>[ClassDataSource<T>(Shared = SharedType.PerClass)]
[Collection("name")][ClassDataSource<T>(Shared = SharedType.Keyed, Key = "name")]
ConstructorConstructor or [Before(Test)]
IDisposableIDisposable or [After(Test)]
IAsyncLifetime[Before(Test)] / [After(Test)]
ITestOutputHelperTestContext parameter
Assert.Equal(expected, actual)await Assert.That(actual).IsEqualTo(expected)
Assert.Throws<T>(() => ...)await Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>(() => ...)

Automated Migration with Code Fixers​

TUnit includes code fixers that automate most of the migration work.

What gets converted:

  • Tests to async Task with awaited assertions
  • [Fact] → [Test], [Theory] → [Test]
  • xUnit assertions to TUnit's fluent syntax
  • [InlineData] → [Arguments], [MemberData] → [MethodDataSource]
  • Constructors and IDisposable to TUnit hooks

The code fixer handles most common patterns automatically (roughly 80-90% of typical test suites). You'll need to manually adjust complex cases like custom fixtures or intricate async patterns.

If you find something that should be automated but isn't, please open an issue.

Steps​

Install the TUnit packages to your test projects​

Use your IDE or the dotnet CLI to add the TUnit packages to your test projects

Remove the automatically added global usings​

In your csproj add:

    <PropertyGroup>
<TUnitImplicitUsings>false</TUnitImplicitUsings>
<TUnitAssertionsImplicitUsings>false</TUnitAssertionsImplicitUsings>
</PropertyGroup>

This is temporary - Just to make sure no types clash, and so the code fixers can distinguish between xUnit and TUnit types with similar names.

Rebuild the project​

This ensures the TUnit packages have been restored and the analyzers should be loaded.

Run the code fixer via the dotnet CLI​

dotnet format analyzers --severity info --diagnostics TUXU0001

Revert step Remove the automatically added global usings​

Perform any manual bits that are still necessary​

This bit's on you! You'll have to work out what still needs doing. Raise an issue if you think it could be automated.

Remove the xUnit packages​

Simply uninstall them once you've migrated

Done! (Hopefully)​

Manual Migration Guide​

Basic Test Structure​

Simple Test (Fact → Test)​

xUnit Code:

public class CalculatorTests
{
[Fact]
public void Add_TwoNumbers_ReturnsSum()
{
var calculator = new Calculator();
var result = calculator.Add(2, 3);
Assert.Equal(5, result);
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class CalculatorTests
{
[Test]
public async Task Add_TwoNumbers_ReturnsSum()
{
var calculator = new Calculator();
var result = calculator.Add(2, 3);
await Assert.That(result).IsEqualTo(5);
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [Fact] → [Test]
  • Test method returns async Task
  • Assertions use fluent syntax with await Assert.That(...)

Parameterized Tests​

Theory with InlineData → Arguments​

xUnit Code:

public class StringTests
{
[Theory]
[InlineData("hello", 5)]
[InlineData("world", 5)]
[InlineData("", 0)]
public void Length_ReturnsCorrectValue(string input, int expectedLength)
{
Assert.Equal(expectedLength, input.Length);
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class StringTests
{
[Test]
[Arguments("hello", 5)]
[Arguments("world", 5)]
[Arguments("", 0)]
public async Task Length_ReturnsCorrectValue(string input, int expectedLength)
{
await Assert.That(input.Length).IsEqualTo(expectedLength);
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [Theory] → [Test]
  • [InlineData(...)] → [Arguments(...)]
  • Method is async and assertions are awaited

Data Sources​

MemberData → MethodDataSource​

xUnit Code:

public class DataDrivenTests
{
[Theory]
[MemberData(nameof(GetTestData))]
public void ProcessData_WithVariousInputs(int value, string text, bool expected)
{
var result = SomeLogic(value, text);
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}

public static IEnumerable<object[]> GetTestData()
{
yield return new object[] { 1, "test", true };
yield return new object[] { 2, "demo", false };
yield return new object[] { 3, "example", true };
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class DataDrivenTests
{
[Test]
[MethodDataSource(nameof(GetTestData))]
public async Task ProcessData_WithVariousInputs(int value, string text, bool expected)
{
var result = SomeLogic(value, text);
await Assert.That(result).IsEqualTo(expected);
}

public static IEnumerable<(int value, string text, bool expected)> GetTestData()
{
yield return (1, "test", true);
yield return (2, "demo", false);
yield return (3, "example", true);
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [MemberData(nameof(...))] → [MethodDataSource(nameof(...))]
  • Data source returns tuples instead of object[] (strongly typed)
  • No need for boxing/unboxing values

ClassData → MethodDataSource​

xUnit Code:

public class TestDataGenerator : IEnumerable<object[]>
{
public IEnumerator<object[]> GetEnumerator()
{
yield return new object[] { 1, "one" };
yield return new object[] { 2, "two" };
}

IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() => GetEnumerator();
}

public class MyTests
{
[Theory]
[ClassData(typeof(TestDataGenerator))]
public void TestWithClassData(int number, string text)
{
Assert.NotNull(text);
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class MyTests
{
[Test]
[MethodDataSource(nameof(TestDataGenerator.GetTestData))]
public async Task TestWithClassData(int number, string text)
{
await Assert.That(text).IsNotNull();
}
}

public class TestDataGenerator
{
public static IEnumerable<(int, string)> GetTestData()
{
yield return (1, "one");
yield return (2, "two");
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [ClassData(typeof(...))] → [MethodDataSource(nameof(ClassName.MethodName))]
  • Point to a static method rather than implementing IEnumerable
  • Use tuples for type safety

Setup and Teardown​

Constructor and IDisposable → Before/After Hooks​

xUnit Code:

public class DatabaseTests : IDisposable
{
private readonly DatabaseConnection _connection;

public DatabaseTests()
{
_connection = new DatabaseConnection();
_connection.Open();
}

[Fact]
public void Query_ReturnsData()
{
var result = _connection.Query("SELECT * FROM Users");
Assert.NotNull(result);
}

public void Dispose()
{
_connection?.Close();
_connection?.Dispose();
}
}

TUnit Equivalent (Option 1: Using IDisposable):

public class DatabaseTests : IDisposable
{
private DatabaseConnection _connection = null!;

public DatabaseTests()
{
_connection = new DatabaseConnection();
_connection.Open();
}

[Test]
public async Task Query_ReturnsData()
{
var result = _connection.Query("SELECT * FROM Users");
await Assert.That(result).IsNotNull();
}

public void Dispose()
{
_connection?.Close();
_connection?.Dispose();
}
}

TUnit Equivalent (Option 2: Using Hooks):

public class DatabaseTests
{
private DatabaseConnection _connection = null!;

[Before(Test)]
public async Task Setup()
{
_connection = new DatabaseConnection();
await _connection.OpenAsync();
}

[Test]
public async Task Query_ReturnsData()
{
var result = _connection.Query("SELECT * FROM Users");
await Assert.That(result).IsNotNull();
}

[After(Test)]
public async Task Cleanup()
{
if (_connection != null)
{
await _connection.CloseAsync();
_connection.Dispose();
}
}
}

Key Changes:

  • Constructor setup can remain, or use [Before(Test)]
  • IDisposable can remain, or use [After(Test)]
  • Hooks support async operations natively
  • Multiple [After(Test)] methods are guaranteed to run even if one fails

IAsyncLifetime → Before/After Hooks​

xUnit Code:

public class AsyncSetupTests : IAsyncLifetime
{
private HttpClient _client = null!;

public async Task InitializeAsync()
{
_client = new HttpClient();
await _client.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/warm-up");
}

[Fact]
public async Task FetchData_ReturnsSuccess()
{
var response = await _client.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/data");
Assert.True(response.IsSuccessStatusCode);
}

public async Task DisposeAsync()
{
_client?.Dispose();
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class AsyncSetupTests
{
private HttpClient _client = null!;

[Before(Test)]
public async Task Setup()
{
_client = new HttpClient();
await _client.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/warm-up");
}

[Test]
public async Task FetchData_ReturnsSuccess()
{
var response = await _client.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/data");
await Assert.That(response.IsSuccessStatusCode).IsTrue();
}

[After(Test)]
public async Task Cleanup()
{
_client?.Dispose();
}
}

Key Changes:

  • IAsyncLifetime.InitializeAsync() → [Before(Test)]
  • IAsyncLifetime.DisposeAsync() → [After(Test)]
  • More explicit and easier to understand at a glance

Shared Context and Fixtures​

IClassFixture → ClassDataSource​

xUnit Code:

public class DatabaseFixture : IDisposable
{
public DatabaseConnection Connection { get; }

public DatabaseFixture()
{
Connection = new DatabaseConnection();
Connection.Open();
}

public void Dispose()
{
Connection?.Close();
Connection?.Dispose();
}
}

public class UserRepositoryTests : IClassFixture<DatabaseFixture>
{
private readonly DatabaseFixture _fixture;

public UserRepositoryTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
_fixture = fixture;
}

[Fact]
public void GetUser_ReturnsUser()
{
var repo = new UserRepository(_fixture.Connection);
var user = repo.GetUser(1);
Assert.NotNull(user);
}

[Fact]
public void GetAllUsers_ReturnsUsers()
{
var repo = new UserRepository(_fixture.Connection);
var users = repo.GetAllUsers();
Assert.NotEmpty(users);
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class DatabaseFixture : IDisposable
{
public DatabaseConnection Connection { get; }

public DatabaseFixture()
{
Connection = new DatabaseConnection();
Connection.Open();
}

public void Dispose()
{
Connection?.Close();
Connection?.Dispose();
}
}

[ClassDataSource<DatabaseFixture>(Shared = SharedType.PerClass)]
public class UserRepositoryTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
[Test]
public async Task GetUser_ReturnsUser()
{
var repo = new UserRepository(fixture.Connection);
var user = repo.GetUser(1);
await Assert.That(user).IsNotNull();
}

[Test]
public async Task GetAllUsers_ReturnsUsers()
{
var repo = new UserRepository(fixture.Connection);
var users = repo.GetAllUsers();
await Assert.That(users).IsNotEmpty();
}
}

Key Changes:

  • IClassFixture<T> interface → [ClassDataSource<T>(Shared = SharedType.PerClass)] attribute
  • Fixture injected via primary constructor
  • Shared = SharedType.PerClass ensures one instance per test class

Collection Fixtures → Shared ClassDataSource​

xUnit Code:

[CollectionDefinition("Database collection")]
public class DatabaseCollection : ICollectionFixture<DatabaseFixture>
{
}

public class DatabaseFixture : IDisposable
{
public DatabaseConnection Connection { get; }

public DatabaseFixture()
{
Connection = new DatabaseConnection();
Connection.Open();
}

public void Dispose() => Connection?.Dispose();
}

[Collection("Database collection")]
public class UserTests : IClassFixture<DatabaseFixture>
{
private readonly DatabaseFixture _fixture;

public UserTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
_fixture = fixture;
}

[Fact]
public void CreateUser_Succeeds()
{
// Test using _fixture.Connection
}
}

[Collection("Database collection")]
public class ProductTests : IClassFixture<DatabaseFixture>
{
private readonly DatabaseFixture _fixture;

public ProductTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
_fixture = fixture;
}

[Fact]
public void CreateProduct_Succeeds()
{
// Test using _fixture.Connection
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class DatabaseFixture : IDisposable
{
public DatabaseConnection Connection { get; }

public DatabaseFixture()
{
Connection = new DatabaseConnection();
Connection.Open();
}

public void Dispose() => Connection?.Dispose();
}

[ClassDataSource<DatabaseFixture>(Shared = SharedType.Keyed, Key = "DatabaseCollection")]
public class UserTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
[Test]
public async Task CreateUser_Succeeds()
{
// Test using fixture.Connection
}
}

[ClassDataSource<DatabaseFixture>(Shared = SharedType.Keyed, Key = "DatabaseCollection")]
public class ProductTests(DatabaseFixture fixture)
{
[Test]
public async Task CreateProduct_Succeeds()
{
// Test using fixture.Connection
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [Collection("name")] → [ClassDataSource<T>(Shared = SharedType.Keyed, Key = "name")]
  • No need for CollectionDefinition class
  • All classes with same Key share the fixture instance

Assembly Fixture → ClassDataSource with PerAssembly​

xUnit doesn't have native assembly fixtures, but TUnit does:

TUnit Example:

public class ApplicationFixture : IDisposable
{
public IServiceProvider ServiceProvider { get; }

public ApplicationFixture()
{
// Setup once for entire assembly
ServiceProvider = ConfigureServices();
}

public void Dispose()
{
// Cleanup once after all tests
}
}

[ClassDataSource<ApplicationFixture>(Shared = SharedType.PerAssembly)]
public class IntegrationTests(ApplicationFixture fixture)
{
[Test]
public async Task Test1()
{
var service = fixture.ServiceProvider.GetService<IMyService>();
await Assert.That(service).IsNotNull();
}
}

Test Output​

ITestOutputHelper → TestContext​

xUnit Code:

public class LoggingTests
{
private readonly ITestOutputHelper _output;

public LoggingTests(ITestOutputHelper output)
{
_output = output;
}

[Fact]
public void Test_WithLogging()
{
_output.WriteLine("Starting test");

var result = PerformOperation();

_output.WriteLine($"Result: {result}");
Assert.True(result > 0);
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class LoggingTests
{
[Test]
public async Task Test_WithLogging(TestContext context)
{
context.OutputWriter.WriteLine("Starting test");

var result = PerformOperation();

context.OutputWriter.WriteLine($"Result: {result}");
await Assert.That(result).IsGreaterThan(0);
}
}

Key Changes:

  • ITestOutputHelper injected in constructor → TestContext injected as method parameter
  • Access output via context.OutputWriter.WriteLine()
  • TestContext provides additional test metadata

Traits and Categories​

Trait → Property​

xUnit Code:

public class FeatureTests
{
[Fact]
[Trait("Category", "Integration")]
[Trait("Priority", "High")]
public void ImportantIntegrationTest()
{
// Test implementation
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

public class FeatureTests
{
[Test]
[Property("Category", "Integration")]
[Property("Priority", "High")]
public async Task ImportantIntegrationTest()
{
// Test implementation
}
}

Key Changes:

  • [Trait("key", "value")] → [Property("key", "value")]
  • Can be used for filtering: --treenode-filter "/*/*/*/*[Category=Integration]"

Assertions​

Basic Assertions​

xUnit Code:

[Fact]
public void Assertions_Examples()
{
Assert.Equal(5, 2 + 3);
Assert.NotEqual(5, 2 + 2);
Assert.True(5 > 3);
Assert.False(5 < 3);
Assert.Null(null);
Assert.NotNull("value");
Assert.Same(obj1, obj2);
Assert.NotSame(obj1, obj3);
}

TUnit Equivalent:

[Test]
public async Task Assertions_Examples()
{
await Assert.That(2 + 3).IsEqualTo(5);
await Assert.That(2 + 2).IsNotEqualTo(5);
await Assert.That(5 > 3).IsTrue();
await Assert.That(5 < 3).IsFalse();
await Assert.That((object?)null).IsNull();
await Assert.That("value").IsNotNull();
await Assert.That(obj1).IsSameReference(obj2);
await Assert.That(obj1).IsNotSameReference(obj3);
}

Collection Assertions​

xUnit Code:

[Fact]
public void Collection_Assertions()
{
var list = new[] { 1, 2, 3 };

Assert.Contains(2, list);
Assert.DoesNotContain(5, list);
Assert.Empty(Array.Empty<int>());
Assert.NotEmpty(list);
Assert.Equal(3, list.Length);
}

TUnit Equivalent:

[Test]
public async Task Collection_Assertions()
{
var list = new[] { 1, 2, 3 };

await Assert.That(list).Contains(2);
await Assert.That(list).DoesNotContain(5);
await Assert.That(Array.Empty<int>()).IsEmpty();
await Assert.That(list).IsNotEmpty();
await Assert.That(list).HasCount().EqualTo(3);
}

String Assertions​

xUnit Code:

[Fact]
public void String_Assertions()
{
var text = "Hello, World!";

Assert.Contains("World", text);
Assert.DoesNotContain("xyz", text);
Assert.StartsWith("Hello", text);
Assert.EndsWith("!", text);
Assert.Matches(@"H\w+", text);
}

TUnit Equivalent:

[Test]
public async Task String_Assertions()
{
var text = "Hello, World!";

await Assert.That(text).Contains("World");
await Assert.That(text).DoesNotContain("xyz");
await Assert.That(text).StartsWith("Hello");
await Assert.That(text).EndsWith("!");
await Assert.That(text).Matches(@"H\w+");
}

Exception Assertions​

xUnit Code:

[Fact]
public void Exception_Assertions()
{
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => ThrowsException());

var ex = Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => ThrowsException());
Assert.Equal("paramName", ex.ParamName);
}

[Fact]
public async Task Async_Exception_Assertions()
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<InvalidOperationException>(() => ThrowsExceptionAsync());
}

TUnit Equivalent:

[Test]
public async Task Exception_Assertions()
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentException>(() => ThrowsException());

var ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentException>(() => ThrowsException());
await Assert.That(ex.ParamName).IsEqualTo("paramName");
}

[Test]
public async Task Async_Exception_Assertions()
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<InvalidOperationException>(() => ThrowsExceptionAsync());
}

Key Changes:

  • Both sync and async use Assert.ThrowsAsync in TUnit
  • Returned exception can be further asserted on

Complete Example: Real-World Test Class​

xUnit Code:

public class UserServiceTests : IClassFixture<DatabaseFixture>, IAsyncLifetime
{
private readonly DatabaseFixture _dbFixture;
private readonly ITestOutputHelper _output;
private UserService _userService = null!;

public UserServiceTests(DatabaseFixture dbFixture, ITestOutputHelper output)
{
_dbFixture = dbFixture;
_output = output;
}

public async Task InitializeAsync()
{
_userService = new UserService(_dbFixture.Connection);
await _userService.InitializeAsync();
}

public Task DisposeAsync() => Task.CompletedTask;

[Theory]
[InlineData("john@example.com", "John")]
[InlineData("jane@example.com", "Jane")]
public async Task CreateUser_WithValidData_Succeeds(string email, string name)
{
_output.WriteLine($"Creating user: {name}");

var user = await _userService.CreateUserAsync(email, name);

Assert.NotNull(user);
Assert.Equal(email, user.Email);
Assert.Equal(name, user.Name);

_output.WriteLine($"User created with ID: {user.Id}");
}

[Fact]
public async Task GetUser_WhenNotFound_ThrowsException()
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<UserNotFoundException>(
() => _userService.GetUserAsync(99999));
}

[Theory]
[MemberData(nameof(GetInvalidEmails))]
public async Task CreateUser_WithInvalidEmail_ThrowsException(string invalidEmail)
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentException>(
() => _userService.CreateUserAsync(invalidEmail, "Test"));
}

public static IEnumerable<object[]> GetInvalidEmails()
{
yield return new object[] { "" };
yield return new object[] { "not-an-email" };
yield return new object[] { "@example.com" };
}
}

TUnit Equivalent:

[ClassDataSource<DatabaseFixture>(Shared = SharedType.PerClass)]
public class UserServiceTests(DatabaseFixture dbFixture)
{
private UserService _userService = null!;

[Before(Test)]
public async Task Setup()
{
_userService = new UserService(dbFixture.Connection);
await _userService.InitializeAsync();
}

[Test]
[Arguments("john@example.com", "John")]
[Arguments("jane@example.com", "Jane")]
public async Task CreateUser_WithValidData_Succeeds(string email, string name, TestContext context)
{
context.OutputWriter.WriteLine($"Creating user: {name}");

var user = await _userService.CreateUserAsync(email, name);

await Assert.That(user).IsNotNull();
await Assert.That(user.Email).IsEqualTo(email);
await Assert.That(user.Name).IsEqualTo(name);

context.OutputWriter.WriteLine($"User created with ID: {user.Id}");
}

[Test]
public async Task GetUser_WhenNotFound_ThrowsException()
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<UserNotFoundException>(
() => _userService.GetUserAsync(99999));
}

[Test]
[MethodDataSource(nameof(GetInvalidEmails))]
public async Task CreateUser_WithInvalidEmail_ThrowsException(string invalidEmail)
{
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentException>(
() => _userService.CreateUserAsync(invalidEmail, "Test"));
}

public static IEnumerable<string> GetInvalidEmails()
{
yield return "";
yield return "not-an-email";
yield return "@example.com";
}
}

Key Differences Summary:

  • Class-level fixtures use attributes instead of interfaces
  • Setup/teardown use [Before]/[After] attributes instead of IAsyncLifetime
  • Primary constructor for fixture injection
  • TestContext injected as method parameter when needed
  • All tests are async by default
  • Data sources return strongly-typed values (not object[])
  • Fluent assertion syntax

Code Coverage​

Important: Coverlet is Not Compatible with TUnit​

If you're using Coverlet (coverlet.collector or coverlet.msbuild) for code coverage in your xUnit projects, you'll need to migrate to Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage.

Why? TUnit uses the modern Microsoft.Testing.Platform instead of VSTest, and Coverlet only works with the legacy VSTest platform.

Good News: Coverage is Built In! 🎉​

When you install the TUnit meta package, it automatically includes Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage for you. You don't need to install it separately!

Migration Steps​

1. Remove Coverlet Packages​

Remove any Coverlet packages from your project file:

Remove these lines from your .csproj:

<!-- Remove these -->
<PackageReference Include="coverlet.collector" Version="x.x.x" />
<PackageReference Include="coverlet.msbuild" Version="x.x.x" />

2. Verify TUnit Meta Package​

Ensure you're using the TUnit meta package (not just TUnit.Core):

Your .csproj should have:

<PackageReference Include="TUnit" Version="0.x.x" />

This automatically brings in:

  • Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage (coverage support)
  • Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport (test result reports)

3. Update Your Coverage Commands​

Replace your old Coverlet commands with the new Microsoft coverage syntax:

Old (Coverlet with xUnit):

# With coverlet.collector
dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"

# With coverlet.msbuild
dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat=cobertura

New (TUnit with Microsoft Coverage):

# Run tests with coverage
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage

# Specify output location
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output ./coverage/

# Specify coverage format (default is cobertura)
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output-format cobertura

# Multiple formats
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output-format cobertura --coverage-output-format xml

4. Update CI/CD Pipelines​

If you have CI/CD pipelines that reference Coverlet, update them to use the new commands:

GitHub Actions Example:

# Old (xUnit with Coverlet)
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"

# New (TUnit with Microsoft Coverage)
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: dotnet run --project ./tests/MyProject.Tests --configuration Release --coverage

Azure Pipelines Example:

# Old (xUnit with Coverlet)
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
inputs:
command: 'test'
arguments: '--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"'

# New (TUnit with Microsoft Coverage)
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
inputs:
command: 'run'
arguments: '--configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output $(Agent.TempDirectory)/coverage/'

Coverage Output Formats​

The Microsoft coverage tool supports multiple output formats:

# Cobertura (default, widely supported)
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output-format cobertura

# XML (Visual Studio format)
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-output-format xml

# Cobertura + XML
dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage \
--coverage-output-format cobertura \
--coverage-output-format xml

Viewing Coverage Results​

Coverage files are generated in your test output directory:

TestResults/
├── coverage.cobertura.xml
└── <guid>/
└── coverage.xml

You can view these with:

  • Visual Studio - Built-in coverage viewer
  • VS Code - Extensions like "Coverage Gutters"
  • ReportGenerator - Generate HTML reports: reportgenerator -reports:coverage.cobertura.xml -targetdir:coveragereport
  • CI Tools - Most CI systems can parse Cobertura format natively

Advanced Coverage Configuration​

You can customize coverage behavior with a .runsettings file:

coverage.runsettings:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RunSettings>
<DataCollectionRunSettings>
<DataCollectors>
<DataCollector friendlyName="Code Coverage">
<Configuration>
<CodeCoverage>
<ModulePaths>
<Include>
<ModulePath>.*\.dll$</ModulePath>
</Include>
<Exclude>
<ModulePath>.*tests\.dll$</ModulePath>
</Exclude>
</ModulePaths>
</CodeCoverage>
</Configuration>
</DataCollector>
</DataCollectors>
</DataCollectionRunSettings>
</RunSettings>

Use it:

dotnet run --configuration Release --coverage --coverage-settings coverage.runsettings

Troubleshooting​

Coverage files not generated?

  • Ensure you're using the TUnit meta package, not just TUnit.Engine
  • Verify you have a recent .NET SDK installed

Missing coverage for some assemblies?

Need help?